Zachary Hamilton, Ph.D. & Brett Bucklin, Ph.D.
This article highlights the significant investigation done in 2016 by ProPublica on the COMPAS risk assessment used in Broward County, Florida. Despite claims that RNAs are unbiased regarding race, the investigation revealed that White individuals with similar scores to minority individuals had a higher rate of recidivism. Recent research has consistently shown that current RNAs tend to classify minorities into higher risk categories inaccurately, mainly due to the inherent racial bias present in criminal history measures.

Related Articles

Pracademically Speaking Talks with Vant4ge on RNA Development

The Practice of Correctional Care: Exploring the Origins of Vant4ge and the Most Advanced RNA Tool on the Market   Building the most advanced risk and needs assessment (RNA) doesn’t just...

Mitigating Racial Bias: Pioneering New Standards in Assessments and Case Management

Vant4ge began working with the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections to build a new assessment tool and the result was an RNA tool that remains to be the most predictively accurate...

Predicting the Future to Improve Today: An Assessment Tool for the 21st Century

For over 40 years, risk-needs assessments (RNAs) have been deployed as a key tool for determining risk and providing programming recommendations for individuals under correctional supervision. The benefits of RNAs...